Performance of Common Reed (Phragmites australis) in a Constructed Wetland for Greywater Treatment in Akure, Nigeria

Alao F.

Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria.

Alatise M. O.

Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria.

Olanrewaju O.O.

Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria.

Oloruntade A. J.

Department of Civil Engineering, Olusegun Agagu University of Science and Technology, Okitipupa, Nigeria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/njas.v4i1.455

Copyright and Licensing

The authors shall retain the copyright of their work but allow the Publisher to publish, copy, distribute, and convey the work.

NASS Journal of Agricultural Sciences publishes accepted manuscripts under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors who submit their papers for publication by NASS Journal of Agricultural Sciences agree to have the CC BY-NC 4.0 license applied to their work, and that anyone is allowed to reuse the article or part of it free of charge for non-commercia. As long as you follow the license terms and original source is properly cited, anyone may copy, redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material.

Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers

It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyright holder. In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. The journal cannot publish material from other publications without permission.

In exceptional circumstances articles may be licensed differently. If you have specific condition (such as one linked to funding) that does not allow this license, please mention this to the editorial office of the journal at submission. Exceptions will be granted at the discretion of the publisher.


Abstract

Shortage of freshwater is becoming a growing problem in both dry and semi-dry regions of the world, hence the need to make use of other source of water for agricultural production. The study was conducted to examine the performance of common reed in a constructed wetland for greywater treatment in Akure, Nigeria. Raw greywater was collected from Jadesola Hostel, Federal University of Technology, Akure, and pretreated through a combination of gravel of diameters < 32 mm, 24 mm and 16 mm with fine sand of diameter 0.2 mm arranged accordingly. The filtered water was thereafter released to a plastic constructed wetland (CW) which also consisted of same combination of layers of gravel and sand with common reed planted on it for complete treatment. The raw and treated greywater were analyzed for Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Dissolved Solid (TDS), and heavy metals. It was discovered that CW planted with common reed was effective in the treatment of greywater with reduction in BOD by 91.4%, COD by 91.5% and TDS by 38.7%. CW had appreciable removal effect on heavy metals with reduction in: manganese (Mn) from 0.100 ppm to 0.012 ppm, iron (Fe) from 0.014 ppm to 0.002 ppm, lead (Pb) from 0.05 ppm to 0.001 ppm and zinc (Zn) from 0.154 ppm to 0.148 ppm. Therefore, the use of common reed in constructed wetland for greywater treatment is recommended for farmers involved in irrigation with greywater, especially during dry seasons, and most importantly under the rising global water scarcity due to climate change.

Keywords: Biochemical oxygen demand, Common reed, Constructed wetland, Greywater, Heavy metals, salinity


References

[1] Shani, U., Dudley, L.M., 2001. Field studies of crop response to water and salt stress. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 65(5), 1522-1528.

[2] Paranychianakis, N.V., Angelakis, A.N., Leverenz, H., Tchobanoglous, G., 2006. Treatment of wastewater with slow rate systems: a review of treatment processes and plant functions. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 36(3), 187-259.

[3] UNDP, 2017. Sustainable development goals. Goal 6 targets facts and figures. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainabledevelopment-goals/ goal-6-clean-water and-sanitation/targets/. (Accessed 23/12/2018).

[4] Oron, G., Adel, M., Agmon, V., Friedler, E., Halperin, R., Leshem, E., Weinberg, D., 2014. Greywater use in Israel and worldwide: standards and prospects. Water research. 58, 92-101.

[5] De Gisi, S., Casella, P., Notarnicola, M., Farina, R., 2016. Grey water in buildings: a mini-review of guidelines, technologies and case studies. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems. 33(1), 35-54.

[6] Bodnar, I., Szabolcsik, A., Baranyai, E., Uveges, A., Boros, N., 2014. Qualitative characterization of household greywater in the northern great plain region of Hungary. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 13(11), 2717-2724.

[7] Zipf, M.S., Pinheiro, I.G., Conegero, M.G., 2016. Simplified greywater treatment systems: Slow filters of sand and slate waste followed by granular activated carbon. Journal of Environmental Management. 176, 119-127.

[8] Kaseva, M., 2004. Performance of Subsurface flow Constructed Wetland in polishing Pre-treated water: A tropical case study. Journal Water Research. 38: 681 - 687.

[9] Joseph, K., 2005. Optimizing Processes for Biological Nitrogen Removal in Nakivubo Wetland, Uganda. Stocholm, Sweeden.

[10] Maine, M.A., Sune, N., Hadal, H., Sanchez, G., Bonetto, C., 2006. Nutrient and Metal Removal in a Constructed Wetland for Wastewater Treatment from a Metallurgic Industry. Ecological Engineering. 26, 341 - 347.

[11] Sohsalam, P., Sirianuntapiboon, S., 2008. Feasibility of using constructed wetland treatment for molasses wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology. 99(13), 5610-5616.

[12] Forbes, E.G.A., Woods, V.B., Easson, D.L., 2004. Constructed Wetlands and their use to Provide Bioremediation of Farm Effluents in Northern Ireland: A review of current literature. Department of Agriculture and Rural Development. Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough.

[13] Pucci, B., Conte, G., Martinuzzi, N., Giovannelli, L., Masi, F., 2000. Design and performance of a horizontal flow constructed wetland for treatment of dairy and agricultural wastewater in the “Chianti” countryside. In Atti del 7 congresso internazionale del gruppo specialistico IWA sull’utilizzo di macrofite per il controllo dell’inquinamento delle acque. pp. 1433-1436.

[14] Jing, S., Lin, Y., Lee, D., Wang, T., 2001. Nutrient Removal from Polluted River Water by Using Constructed Wetlands. Bioresource Technology. 76, 131- 135.

[15] Li, L.,Li,Y.,Biswas,D.K.,Nian,Y.,Jiang,G.,2008. Potential of constructed wetlands in treating the eutrophic water: evidence from Taihu Lake of China. Bioresource Technology. 99(6), 1656-1663.

[16] Vymazal, J., 2011. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: five decades of experience. Environmental Science and Technology. 45(1), 61-69.

[17] Vymazal, J., 2010. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water. 2(3), 530-549.

[18] Xu, J., Zhang, J., Xie, H., Li, C., Bao, N., Zhang, C., Shi, Q., 2010. Physiological responses of Phragmites australis to wastewater with different chemical oxygen demands. Ecological Engineering. 36(10), 1341-1347.

[19] Lehl, H.K., Ong, S.A., Ho, L.N., Wong, Y.S., Naemah Mohd Saad, F., Oon, Y.L., Oon, Y.S., Yong, C.Y., Thung, W.E., 2016. Multiple aerobic and anaerobic baffled constructed wetlands for simultaneous nitrogen and organic compounds removal. Desalination and Water Treatment. 57(60), 29160-29167.

[20] Phan, T.D., Dinh, N.T., 2017. Highly Efficient Treatment of Shrimp Farm Wastewater by Using the Horizontal Subsurface Flow (HSSF) Constructed Wetlands with Phragmites australis Plant. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology. 4(3), 1-9.

[21] Manh, N.C., Minh, P.V., Hung, N.T.Q., Son, P.T., Ky, N.M., 2019. A study to assess the effectiveness of constructed wetland technology for polluted surface water treatment. VNU Journal of Science: Earth and Environmental Sciences. 35(2), 11-22.

[22] Haslam, S.M., 2010. A Book of Reed: (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel, FormerlyPhragmites communis Trin.). Forrest Text, Cardigan, GB, 254.

[23] Allirand, J.M., Gosse, G., 1995. An aboveground biomass production model for a common reed (Phragmites communis Trin.) stand. Biomass and Bioenergy. 9(6), 441-448.

[24] Ridderstolpe, P., 2004. Introduction to Greywater Management. Stochholm Environment Institute, Sweden, Report 2004-4.

[25] Deguenon, H.E.J., Hounkpe, M.P., Aina, J.A., Sohounhlore, D.C.K., 2013. Purification Performances of Common Reed beds Based on the Residence time: Case study of Benin. Journal of Applied Biosciences. 71, 5682-5691.

[26] Marzec, M., Jozwiakowski, K., Debska, A., Gizinska-Goma, G., Pytka-Woszczylo, A., Kowalazyk-Jusko, A., Listosz, A., 2018. The Efficiency and Reliability of Pollutant Removal in a Hybrid Constructed Wetland with Common reed, Manna grass and Virginia mallow. Water Journal. 10, 1-18.

[27] Kurniadie, D., Wijaya, D., Widayat, D., Umiyati, U., Iskandar, 2018. Constructed Wetland to Treat Tapioca Starch Wastewater in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution. 15(3), 10-113.

[28] Pescod, M.B., 1992. Wastewater treatment and use in agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage. Pap. 4, Rome, Italy.

[29] Omami, E.N., 2005. Response of Amaranth to Salinity Stress. PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

[30] Agarwal, S., Pandey, V., 2004. Atioxidant Enzyme Response to NaCl stress in Cassia angustifolia. Biologia Plantarum. 48(4), 555-560.

[31] Plaut, Z., Edelstein, M., Ben-Hur, M., 2013. Overcoming Salinity Barriers to Crop Production using Traditional Methods. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 32(4), 250-291.

[32] Bilha, E., 2006. Biochemical Oxygen Demand reaction Kinetics and Mass Transfer in Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland. MSc Dissertation. University of Dar es Salaam.

[33] Seswoya, R., Zainal, M.Y., 2010. Subsurface-flow Constructed Wetland: Proposed design area for high strength effluent domestic wastewater.

[34] Nakwanit, S., Visoottiviseth, P., Khokiattiwong, S., Sangchoom, W., 2011. Management of arsenic accumulated waste from constructed wetland treatment of mountain tap-water. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 185, 1081-1085.

[35] Akinbile, C.O., Yusoff, M.S., Ahmad Zuki, A.Z.,2012. Landfill Leachate Treatment using sub-surface flow constructed wetland by Cyperus haspan. Waste Manag. 32(7), 1387-1393.

[36] Tuheteru, F.D., Kusmana, C., Mansur, I., Iskandar, Tuheteru, E.J., 2016. Potential of Lonkida (Nauclea orientalis L.) for Phytoremediation of Acid Mined Drainage at PT. Bukit Asam Tbk. (Persero), Indonesia. Research Journal of Botany. 11(1-3), 9-17.

[37] Pongthornpruek, S., 2017. Swine Farm Wastewater Treatment by Constructed Wetland Planted with Vetiver Grass. Environment and Natural Resources Journal. 15(2), 13-20.

[38] Nguyen, P.M., Pham, H.T., Le, L.K.T., Vu, A.N., 2018. Capacity of wetland mesocosm planted with cyperus alternifolius in mining wastewater treatment. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences. 20(4), 1140-1146.

[39] Thathong, V., Tantamsapya, N., Yossapol, C., Liao, C.H., Wirojanagud, W., Padungthon, S., 2019. Role of Colocasia esculenta L. schott in arsenic removal by a pilot-scale constructed wetland filled with laterite soil. Heliyon 5, e01233.

[40] Prasetya, A., Prihutami, P., Warisaura, A.D., Fahrurrozi, M., Petrus, H.T.B.M., 2020. Characteristic of Hg removal using zeolite adsorption and Echinodorus palaefolius phytoremediation in subsurface flow constructed wetland (SSFCW) model. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 8(3), 103781.

[41] WHO, 1995. Manual for Recreational Water and Beach Quality Monitoring and Assessment. Draft. WHO regional office for Europe, European Center for Environment and Health.