Research on World Agricultural Economy

Land Use, Productivity, and Profitability of Traditional Rice–Wheat System Could be Improved by Conservation Agriculture

Mohammad Mobarak Hossain

Department of Agronomy, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 2202, Bangladesh

Mahfuza Begum

Department of Agronomy, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 2202, Bangladesh

Richard W Bell

Centre for Sustainable Farming Systems, Future Food Institute, Murdoch University, WA 6150, Australia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v3i2.516

Received: 8 April 2022; Received in revised form: 22 May 2022; Accepted: 27 May 2022; Published: 30 May 2022

---

Abstract

Power tiller-driven plow tillage and crop residue exclusionary Traditional Agriculture practices are expensive, labor-demanding, soil damage, and eco-unfriendly. Over the last several years, pursuits of crop production through sustaining the productive capacity of soils, and environmental quality, have raised concern to adopt Conservation Agriculture worldwide. Single tillage combined with herbicides and crop residue retention principles of Conservation Agriculture is being developed. Between 2016–2017 and 2017–2018, a two-year on-farm experiment was done in Bangladesh. We practiced two crop establishment methods; Traditional Agriculture: Plow tillage followed by three manual weeding without residue preservation of previous crop and Conservation Agriculture: Pre-plant herbicide + single tillage + pre-emergence herbicide + post-emergence herbicide; under rice–wheat and rice–wheat–mungbean systems. Data reveal that Conservation Agriculture was a more cost-effective crop establishment technique than Traditional Agriculture in rice, wheat, and mungbean by increasing the ratio of benefit to costs by 24.3%, 35.7% and 48.8%, respectively, with savings in tillage operations (66.3%, 58.1%, and 57.6%, respectively), weeding expenditures (59.2%, 24.5%, and 42.2%, respectively), and manpower requirements (25.1%, 27.2%, and 31.3%, respectively). This has resulted in an increase of 32% productivity of rice–wheat–mungbean systems with the yield advantage of 16%, 31% and 37% in rice, wheat and mungbean, respectively. When mungbean was added, the rice–wheat system’s productivity rose by 43%. The rice–wheat–mungbean system under Traditional Agriculture had the highest land utilization efficiency (99.45%), followed by Conservation Agriculture (92.05%), which expanded the scope to include additional crops in the rice–wheat–mungbean system. Moreover, Conservation Agriculture had a 59.7% greater production efficiency than Traditional Agriculture, where the rice–wheat–mungbean system having the highest production efficiency (53.00 kg^–1 ha^–1 day^–1), followed by the rice–wheat system (45.57 kg^–1 ha^–1 day^–1).

Keywords: Plow tillage, Single tillage, Herbicides, Crop residues, Land utilization efficiency, Production efficiency, Rice equivalent yield

---

References

[1] Li, F., Zhang, X., Xu, D., et al., 2022. No-Tillage Promotes Wheat Seedling Growth and Grain Yield Compared with Plow–Rotary Tillage in a Rice– Wheat Rotation in the High Rainfall Region in China. Agronomy. 12(4), 865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040865

[2] Kumar, D., Hamd-Alla, W., Shivay, Y., et al., 2021. Diversification of rice–wheat cropping system to sustain the productivity and profitability. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 91(4), 597-601.

[3] Kundu, D.K., Mazumdar, S.P., Ghosh, D., et al., 2016. Long-term effects of fertilizer and manure application on soil quality and sustainability of jute– rice–wheat production system in Indo-Gangetic plain. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 8(4), 1793-1800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i4.1042

[4] Nawaz, A., Farooq, M., Nadeem, F., et al., 2019. Rice–wheat cropping systems in South Asia: issues, options and opportunities. Crop and Pasture Science. 70(5), 395-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/CP18383

[5] Bell, R.W., Haque, M.E., Jahiruddin, M., et al., 2019. Conservation agriculture for rice-based intensive cropping by smallholders in the eastern gangetic plain. Agriculture (Switzerland). 9(1), 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9010005

[6] Mishra, J.S., Poonia, S.P., Kumar, R., et al., 2021. An impact of agronomic practices of sustainable rice– wheat crop intensification on food security, economic adaptability, and environmental mitigation across eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research. 267, 108164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108164

[7] Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Derpsch, R., 2019. Global spread of conservation agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Studies. 76(1), 29-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2018.1494927

[8] Hossain, M.M., Begum, M., Rahman, M., et al., 2021. Resource conservation technology for sustainable productivity of intensive rice-based cropping pattern in Bangladesh. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology. 7(1), 053- 060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-815X.000088

[9] Farmer, J.A., Bradley, K.W., Young, B.G., et al., 2017. Influence of tillage method on management of Amaranthus species in soybean. Weed Technology. 31(1), 10-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/wt-d-16-00061.1

[10] Adhikary, P., Ghosh, R.K., 2014. Effects of cropping sequence and weed management on density and vertical distribution of weed seeds in alluvial soil. Journal of Crop and Weed. 10(2), 504-507.

[11] Krishna, V., Keil, A., Aravindakshan, S., et al., 2017. Conservation tillage for sustainable wheat intensification: the example of South Asia. In: Achieving Sustainable Cultivation of Wheat. 1st ed. Cambridge CB22 3HJ UK: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited. pp. 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2016.0004.14

[12] Sen, S., Kaur, D., Das, T.K., et al., 2021. Impacts of herbicides on weeds, water productivity, and nutrient-use efficiency in dry direct-seeded rice. Paddy and Water Environment. 19(2), 227-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-020-00834-3

[13] Busi, R., Powles, S.B., 2017. Inheritance of 2,4-D resistance traits in multiple herbicide- resistant Raphanus raphanistrum populations. Plant Science. 257, 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.01.003

[14] Li, S., Hu, M., Shi, J., et al., 2022. Improving longterm crop productivity and soil quality through integrated straw-return and tillage strategies. Agronomy Journal. 114, 1500-1511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20831

[15] BRRI, 2021. Modern Rice Cultivation. 23rd ed. Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh. pp. 103.

[16] BARI, 2019. Handbook on Agro-technology. 8th ed. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh. pp. 535.

[17] Lal, B., Gautam, P., Panda, B.B., et al., 2017. Crop and varietal diversification of rainfed rice-based cropping systems for higher productivity and profitability in eastern India. PLoS One. 12(4), e0175709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175709

[18] Islam, M., Nath, L.K., Samajdar, T., 2020. Sustainable diversification of maize (Zea mays L.) -legumes cropping systems for productivity, profitability and resource-use efficiency in West Garo Hills of Meghalaya, India. Legume Research. (43), 427-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-3970

[19] Perrin, R., Anderson, J., Winkelmann, D., et al., 1988. The partial budget. In: Cassaday K, editor. From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economics training manual. Maxico, DF: CIMMYT. pp. 97.

[20] IRRI, 2014. Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR). Biometrics and Breeding Informatics, PBGB Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, The Philippines.

[21] Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A., 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 704.

[22] Hossain, M., Begum, M., Rahman, M., et al., 2019. Effects of the components of conservation agriculture on the profitability of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the Eastern Gangetic Plain of Bangladesh. International Journal of Agricultural and Life Sciences. 7(1), 333-337.

[23] Rodenburg, J., Büchi, L., Haggar, J., 2020. Adoption by adaptation: moving from Conservation Agriculture to conservation practices, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 19(5-6), 437-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1785734

[24] Luying, S., Fengbin, S., Shengqun, L., et al., 2018. Integrated agricultural management practice improves soil quality in Northeast China. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 64(14), 1932-1943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1468077

[25] Xiao, L., Kuhn, N.J., Zhao, R., et al., 2021. Net effects of conservation agriculture principles on sustainable land use: A synthesis. Global Change Biology. 27, 6321-6330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15906

[26] Alam, M.K., Bell, R.W., Biswas, W.K., 2019. Increases in soil sequestered carbon under conservation agriculture cropping decrease the estimated greenhouse gas emissions of wetland rice using life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 224, 72- 87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.215

[27] Hossain, A., Mottaleb, K.A., Maitra, S., et al., 2021. Conservation Agriculture Improves Soil Health: Major Research Findings from Bangladesh. In: Jayaraman S, Dalal RC, Patra AK, Chaudhari SK (eds) Conservation Agriculture: A Sustainable Approach for Soil Health and Food Security. Springer, Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0827-8_26

[28] Zhang, Y., Li, X., Gregorich, E.G., et al., 2018. No-tillage with continuous maize cropping enhances soil aggregation and organic carbon storage in Northeast China. Geoderma. 330, 204-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.037

[29] Singh, V., Jat, M.L., Ganie, Z.A., et al., 2016. Herbicide options for effective weed management in dry direct-seeded rice under scented rice–wheat rotation of western indo-gangetic plains. Crop Protection. 81, 168-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.12.021

[30] Zahan, T., Hashem, A., Rahman, M., et al., 2018. Efficacy of herbicides in non-puddled transplanted rice under conservation agriculture systems and their effect on establishment of the succeeding crops. Acta Scientifica Malaysia. 2(1), 17-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26480/asm.01.2018.17.25

[31] Brito, I.P., Tropaldi, L., Carbonari, C.A., et al., 2018. Hormetic effects of glyphosate on plants. Pest Management Science. 74(5), 1064-1070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4523

[32] Belz, R.G., Duke, S.O., 2017. Herbicide-Mediated Hormesis. In: Pesticide Dose: Effects on the Environment and Target and Non-Target Organisms. ACS Symposium Series, American Chemical Society. 1249, 135-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2017-1249.ch010

[33] Shalini, B., Didal, V.K., Singh, V.K., 2017. Influence of pre- and post- emergence herbicides on weeds and yield of dwarf field pea. International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience. 5(2), 675-668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2615

[34] Mustari, S., Bari, M.N., Islam, M.R., et al., 2016. Evaluation of selected herbicides on weed control efficiency and yield of wheat. Journal of Science Foundation. 12(2), 27-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jsf.v12i2.27734

[35] Lu, X., 2020. A meta-analysis of the effects of crop residue return on crop yields and water use efficiency. Plos One. 15(4), e0231740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231740

[36] Hossain, M., Begum, M., Rahman, M.M., et al., 2021. Influence of non-puddled transplanting and residues of previous mustard on rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology. 1(1), 8-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51483/IJAGST.1.1.2021.8-14

[37] Hossain, M., Begum, M., Hashem, A., et al., 2020. Weed control in strip planted wheat under conservation agriculture practice is more effective than conventional tillage. Scientific Journal of Crop Science. 9(6), 438-450.

[38] Akhtar, K., Wang, W., Ren, G., et al., 2018. Changes in soil enzymes, soil properties, and maize crop productivity under wheat straw mulching in Guanzhong, China. Soil and Tillage Research. 182, 94-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.05.007

[39] Xu, H., Sieverding, H., Kwon, H., et al., 2019. Global meta-analysis of soil organic carbon response to corn stover removal. GCB Bioenergy. 11, 1215-1233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12631

[40] Huang, R., Tian, D., Liu, J., et al., 2018. Responses of soil carbon pool and soil aggregates associated organic carbon to straw and straw-derived biochar addition in a dryland cropping mesocosm system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 265, 576- 586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.07.013

[41] Lu, X., 2020. A meta-analysis of the effects of crop residue return on crop yields and water use efficiency. PLoS One. 15(4), e0231740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231740

[42] Haque, E., Bell, R.W., 2019. Partially mechanized non-puddled rice establishment: on-farm performance and farmers’ perceptions. Plant Production Science. 22(1), 23-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2018.1564335

[43] Islam, A.K.M.S., Hossain, M.M., Saleque, M.A., 2015. Effect of unpuddled transplanting on the growth and yield of dry season rice (Oryza sativa L.) in high barind tract. The Agriculturists. 12(2), 91-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/agric.v12i2.21736

[44] Hossain, M., Begum, M., Bell, R., 2020. On-farm evaluation of conservation agriculture practice on weed control and yield of wheat in northern Bangladesh. Current Research in Agricultural Sciences. 7(2), 84-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.68.2020.72.84.99

[45] Islam, A.K.M.M., Popy, F.S., Hasan, A.K., et al., 2017. Efficacy and economics of herbicidal weed management in monsoon rice of Bangladesh: Weed Management in Monsoon Rice of Bangladesh. Journal of Scientific Agriculture. 1, 275-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25081/jsa.2017.v1.834

[46] Islam, A.M., Hia, M.A.U.H., Sarkar, S.K., et al., 2018. Herbicide based weed management in aromatic rice of Bangladesh. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University. 16(1), 31-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v16i1.36478

[47] Muoni, T., Rusinamhodzi, L., Rugare, J.T., et al., 2014. Effect of herbicide application on weed flora under conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. Crop Protection. 66, 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.08.008

[48] Rugare, J.T., Pieterse, P.J., Mabasa, S., 2019. Effect of short-term maize–cover crop rotations on weed emergence, biomass and species composition under conservation agriculture. South African Journal of Plant and Soil. 36(5), 329-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2019.1594419

[49] Nhamo, N., Lungu, O.N., 2017. Opportunities for smallholder farmers to benefit from conservation agricultural practices. In: Smart technologies for sustainable smallholder agriculture: upscaling in developing countries. Elsevier Inc. pp. 145-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810521-4.00007-4

[50] Hossain, M.M., Begum, M., Hashem, A., et al., 2021. Mulching and weed management effects on the performance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) transplanted in non-puddled soil. Journal of Wastes and Biomass Management. 3(1), 13-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26480/jwbm.01.2021.13.21

[51] Salahin, N., Jahiruddin, M., Islam, M.R., et al., 2021. Establishment of crops under minimal soil disturbance and crop residue retention in rice-based cropping system: yield advantage, soil health improvement, and economic benefit. Land. 10, 581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060581

[52] Naab, J.B., Mahama, G.Y., Yahaya, I., et al., 2017. Conservation agriculture improves soil quality, crop yield, and incomes of smallholder farmers in north western Ghana. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8(996), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00996

[53] Hossain, M.M., Begum, M., Hashem, A., et al., 2020. Interactive effects of strip planting, herbicides and wheat straw mulch on weed control and yield of mungbean in northern Bangladesh. International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies. 6(12), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4889117

[54] Hossain, M., Sarkar, M., Jahiruddin, M., et al., 2016. Productivity and partial budget analysis in wheat– rice sequences as influenced by integrated plant nutrition system and legume crops inclusion. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research. 41(1), 17-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v41i1.27665

[55] Bhatt, R., Meena, R.S., Hossain, A., 2022. Input use efficiency in rice–wheat cropping systems to manage the footprints for food and environmental security. In: Bhatt R, Meena RS, Hossain A, editors. Input Use efficiency for food and environmental security. Springer, Singapore. pp. 1-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5199-1_1