Economics of Pulse Production in Bundelkhand Region of Uttar Pradesh, India: An Empirical Analysis
Article ID: 560
Abstract
Bundelkhand region contributes more than half of total pulse area of the Uttar Pradesh state but the productivity is below the state average, which calls for various technological interventions, development of infrastructure and marketing strategies. This study assessed the profitability of pulse cultivation, identified the constraints and suggested policy measures using the data collected during 2016-2017 from 100 pulse growers selected from two backward districts of Bundelkhand region, namely Jalaun and Hamirpur. Growth in area, production and yield was estimated using data for 1980-2015 through compound annual growth rate and the highest growth was observed during 1980-1990 period. Modern cost concepts were used to assess the profitability of pulse cultivation and results revealed that the cost of cultivation per hectare was significantly higher in pigeon pea in comparison to gram, pea and lentil crops. The marketing charges paid by the village trader, wholesaler and retailer ranged between INR 20 to INR 40 per quintal for different crops. It was also observed that the quantum of marketable surplus and its percentage share to total production in pigeon pea, gram and lentil increased with the increase in size of land holding. The pulse production in the region faced with constraints related to production, processing and marketing. Hence, technologies and infrastructure need to be embraced through suitable policies to favour farmers, so as to maintain balance and keep the interest of both producers and the consumers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alexandratos, N., Bruinsma, J., 2012. World agriculture towards 2030/2050 (ESA Working Paper No. 12–03). Rome: FAO.
Inbasekar, K., Roy, D., Joshi, P.K., 2015. Supply-side dynamics of chickpeas and pigeon peas in India (IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 01454). New Delhi: South Asia Office.
Jukanti, A.K., Gaur, P.M., Gowda, C.L.L., et al., 2012. Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): A review. British Journal of Nutrition. 108(S1), S11-S26.
DAC & FW, 2019. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi. (Accessed on 05.01.2022)
DAC & FW, 2021. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi. (Accessed on 06.01.2022)
Katiyar, M., 2007. Improved varieties of pulses for Uttar Pradesh C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur.
DAC & FW, 2018. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi. (Accessed on 05.01.2022)
Singh, S.K., Praharaj, C.S., Singh, L., 2012. Farmers participatory approach in seed multiplication of pulses in Bundelkhand region - a case study. Journal of Food Legumes. 25(4), 330-333.
Samra, J.S., 2008. Report on Drought Mitigation Strategy for Bundelkhand Region of Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh. Inter-ministerial Team, New Delhi.
Mondal, B., Singh, A., Sekar, I., et al., 2016. Institutional arrangements for watershed development programmes in Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh, India: an explorative study. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 32(2), 219-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2015.1060195
Sah, U., Dixit, G.P., Kumar, N., et al., 2021. Status and strategies for development of pulses in Bundelkhand Region of India: a review. Legume Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4518
Singh, S., Nayak, S., 2020. Development of sustainable livelihood security index for different agro-climatic zones of Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal Of Rural Development. 39(1), 110-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2020/v39/i1/125991
Palsaniya, D.R., Singh, R., Tewari, R.K., et al., 2008. Socioeconomic and livelihood analysis of people in Garhkundar-Dabar watershed of central India. Indian Journal of Agroforestry. 10, 65-72.
Mondal, B., Singh, A., Singh, S.D., et al., 2017. Augmentation of water resources potential and cropping intensification through watershed programs. Water Environment Research. 90(2), 101-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X1490296 8254700
Alam, N.M., Adhikary, P.P., Jana, C., et al., 2012. Application of Markov Model and Standardized Precipitation Index for Analysis of Droughts in Bundelkhand Region of India. Journal of Tree Sciences. 31(1&2), 46-53.
Ahmed, A., Deb, D., Mondal, S., 2019. Assessment of Rainfall Variability and its Impact on Groundnut Yield in Bundelkhand Region of India. Current Science. 117(5), 794-803.
Gupta, A.K., Nair, S.S., Ghosh, O., et al., 2014. Bundelkhand Draught - A retrospective analysis and way ahead. National Institute of Disaster Management, New Delhi – 110002. pp. 148.
Raju, V.T., Rao, D.V.S., 1990. Economics of Farm Production and Management, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Nirmala, B., Muthuraman, P., 2009. Economic and constraint analysis of rice cultivation in Kaithal District of Haryana. Food Research & Development. 9(1), 47-49.
Merga, B., Haji, J., 2019. Economic importance of chickpea: production, value, and world trade. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 5(1), 1615718. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1615718
Government of India, 2015. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare. http://eands.dacnet.nic.in.
Wood, J.A., Grusak, M.A., Yadav, S.S., et al., 2007. Nutritional value of chickpea. Chickpea Breeding and Management, CAB International, Wallingford. pp. 101-142. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845932138.005.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v3i3.560
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2022 The author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.