Socioeconomic Assessment of Mandarin Postharvest Loss: A Case of Gandaki Province, Nepal

Yogendra Acharya(Planning Division, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Singha Durbar Plaza, Kathmandu, P.O. Box 5459, Nepal)
Namdev Upadhyaya(Planning Division, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Singha Durbar Plaza, Kathmandu, P.O. Box 5459, Nepal)
Sudha Sapkota(Monitoring and Evaluation Division, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Singha Durbar Plaza, Kathmandu, P.O. Box 5459, Nepal)

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v4i1.787

Article ID: 787

Abstract


This study focused on the socioeconomic assessment of mandarin postharvest loss in the Gandaki Province of Nepal. Two mandarin growing districts Tanahun and Syangja of Gandaki province were selected for study purposes. A simple random method of sampling was employed to select 45 mandarin farmers from each district making a total sample size of 90. Primary data were collected with the help of a pre-tested semi-structured interview schedule along with two focus group discussions and field observation of the mandarin orchard. Data were analyzed by using both descriptive and inferential statistics. This paper explored the mandarin production status, major post-harvest practices, marketing channels, and barriers to post-harvest technology adoption. The findings revealed that farmers were producing 5.4 tons of fresh mandarin each year earning around 50 thousand Nepalese rupees as profit from mandarin farming. Similarly, the result showed that the post-harvest loss was 8%-9% during the harvesting, grading, and packaging operation while a loss of 2%-3% was recorded during the transportation of mandarin from the production site to the wholesaler site. In total, loss ranging from 14%-18% was recorded in all chains of mandarin postharvest operations. Also, it was found that more than two-thirds (76.7%) of farmers practiced mandarin marketing based on preharvest contracts. The technical know-how of farmers about post-harvest technologies was a major challenge associated with the low adoption of mandarin post-harvest technologies. The concerned government agency, I/NGOs, and other organizations need to emphasize post-harvest loss issues by incorporating loss minimization activities in their program ensuring higher adoption of postharvest technologies by mandarin farmers and traders.


Keywords


Agro-pastoralists perception; Post-harvest; Mandarin; Technology; Adoption

Full Text:

PDF

References


MoALD, 2020. Statistical information Nepalese Agriculture, Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.

Rokaya, P., Baral, D., Gautam, D., et al., 2016. Effect of postharvest treatments on quality and shelf life of mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). American Journal of Plant Sciences. 7, 1098-1105.DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2016.77105

Bhattarai, D.R., 2018. Postharvest horticulture in Nepal. Horticulture International Journal. 2(6), 458-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/hij.2018.02.00096

Tripathi, P C , Shukla, A.K, Babu, N., et al., 2016. Role of women in horticulture and women friendly technologies. Directorate of Research on Women in Agriculture: Bhubaneswar ,India.

Gautam, D.M., Bhattarai, D.R., 2012. Postharvest horticulture. Bhawani Printers. Chabahil Kathmandu, Nepal.

Bhattarai, R.R., Rijal, R.K., Mishra, P., 2013. Post-harvest losses in mandarin orange: A case study of Dhankuta District, Nepal.

Shrestha, D., 2015. Production cost and market analysis of mandarin in Dhading district of Nepal. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment. 16.

Pokhrel, C.N., 2011. Analysis of market chain of mandarin in Nepal: A case of Lamjung district Nepal. Master dissertation, Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Bastakoti, R.C., 2002. Production and marketing efficiency of mandarin orange in western hills of Nepal. Master dissertation, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.

Gangwar, L.S., Singh, D., Singh, D.B., 2007. Estimation of post-harvest losses in Kinnow Mandarin in Punjab using a modified formula. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 20(347-2016-16644), 315- 331.

NCRP, 2020. Annual progress report. National Citrus Research Program, Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2023 The author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.